Skip to main content

Together we are beating cancer

Donate now
  • Science & Technology

Artificial intelligence reveals prostate cancer is not just one disease

by Amy Warnock | News

29 February 2024

13 comments 13 comments

Prostate Cancer cell image taken using a Scanning Electron Microscope
Prostate Cancer cell image taken using a Scanning Electron Microscope. Credit: LRI EM Unit

Research published in Cell Genomics today has shown that prostate cancer, which affects one in six men in the UK in their lifetime, includes two different subtypes of the disease, also known as evotypes.  

This discovery was made by using artificial intelligence (AI) to help unlock new discoveries about the evolution of prostate cancer.  

Just as humans – or Homo sapiens – have evolved into a species over time from our ancestors, the development of cancer is also an evolutionary process. By looking at the evolutionary tree of cancer, we can find out a lot about the disease, and it can even help us develop new treatments. 

“Our research demonstrates that prostate tumours evolve along multiple pathways, leading to two distinct disease types,” said lead researcher Dr Dan Woodcock, of the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences at the University of Oxford.   

“This understanding is pivotal as it allows us to classify tumours based on how the cancer evolves rather than solely on individual gene mutations or expression patterns.” 

The power of AI 

The study, funded by Cancer Research UK and Prostate Cancer Research, involved researchers working together as part of an international consortium, called The Pan Prostate Cancer Group, from the University of Oxford, the University of Manchester, the University of East Anglia and the Institute of Cancer Research, London.  

The researchers analysed the DNA of prostate cancer samples in 159 patients using whole genome sequencing – a comprehensive way of looking at the entirety of someone’s genetic material.  

They then used an AI technique known as neural networks to compare the DNA of the different samples.  

This identified two distinct cancer groups among these patients.  

These two groups were then confirmed using two other mathematical approaches applied to different aspects of the data. And importantly, this finding was also validated in other independent datasets from Canada and Australia.  

The researchers were then able to integrate all of this information to generate an evolutionary tree showing how the two subtypes of prostate cancer develop, ultimately converging into two distinct ‘evotypes’. 

“This study is really important because until now, we thought that prostate cancer was just one type of disease. But it is only now, with advancements in artificial intelligence, that we have been able to show that there are actually two different subtypes at play,” said Professor Colin Cooper, from UEA’s Norwich Medical School. 

“We hope that the findings will not only save lives through better diagnosis and tailored treatments in the future, but they may help researchers working in other cancer fields better understand other types of cancer too.” 

Revolutionising the future of prostate cancer treatment

It’s hoped that these findings could revolutionise how prostate cancer is diagnosed and treated in the future. 

Crucially, the team’s collaboration with Cancer Research UK aims to develop a genetic test that, when combined with conventional staging and grading, can provide a more precise prognosis for each patient, allowing tailored treatment decisions. 

The work published today by this global consortium of researchers has the potential to make a real difference to people affected by prostate cancer. The more we understand about cancer the better chance we have of developing treatments to beat it.  

We are proud to have helped fund this cutting-edge work, which has laid the foundations for personalised treatments for people with prostate cancer, allowing more people to beat their disease.

- Dr Rupal Mistry, senior science engagement manager at Cancer Research UK

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men in the UK with around 55,000 cases a year. While prostate cancer is responsible for a large proportion of all male cancer deaths, it is more commonly a disease men die with rather than from. Research like this is key, as knowing when to avoid unnecessary treatment is also important, to help spare men from related side-effects such as incontinence and impotence.  

“We simply don’t know enough about what a prostate cancer diagnosis means at present – there are many men who have disease which is or may become aggressive and being able to treat aggressive disease more effectively is critical,” said Dr Naomi Elster, Director of Research at Prostate Cancer Research. 

“But on the other side of the coin are the too many men who live with side effects of cancer treatment they may never have needed.  

“These results could be the beginning of us being able to take the same ‘divide and conquer’ approach to prostate cancer that has worked in other diseases, such as breast cancer.” 

    Comments

  • Tarhib IT Limited
    30 July 2024

    Fascinating discovery about prostate cancer! The use of artificial intelligence to uncover these insights is truly groundbreaking. Thanks for sharing this important advancement in cancer research!

  • ANDRES LOAIZA
    27 April 2024

    I believe that the most recent discrimination of Prostate Ca in 2 subgroups is very important at this time as Prostate Ca. presents in variable stages which allow the treatment to take place between patients and doctors but many times make the treatment and prognosis cumbersome in the precision and accuracy of treatment to medium and longterm. I had total prostatectomy by robotic surgery but significant secondary effects and its consequences

  • Paul Diggory
    24 March 2024

    This feels like hugely important research. After diagnosis with prostate cancer early last year I went through a radical prostatectomy in July. After three quarterly blood tests my second and third have shown increased PSA levels. Whilst still virtually undetectable my consultant feels it important to bring me back for radiotherapy. That’s OK, but what about hormone therapy? Some research points to it not being necessary, other work shows that it’s more likely to finish off the cancer if you have a course of both. But at what cost in terms of side effects that affect your quality of life. Clarity at an earlier stage on how best to treat your disease has to be a good thing for all future prostate cancer patients.

  • Michael Perris
    22 March 2024

    It is excellent news – quite ground breaking?
    I believe that GP’s need to be less doubting than some currently are. Due to these doubts action is often delayed to the detriment of the patient, which is very worrying indeed. I hope things progress in this area.
    Thank you all who are tirelessly working on a solution for this cancer.

  • Jennifer Hale
    22 March 2024

    Working as a research nurse with men who are diagnosed with prostate cancer, PSA readings and scans if PSA results start to climb are still the best indicators for progression. I would agree that many men live with the disease, and eventually die of something else. The exception being those who are diagnosed younger with metastatic spread at diagnosis. Family history can suggest a hereditary risk.

  • Jide Awe
    21 March 2024

    This statement in your write-up resonates: “While prostate cancer is responsible for a large proportion of all male cancer deaths, it is more commonly a disease men die with rather than from.”

  • Joseph Dublin
    19 March 2024

    Just great news and progress. So pleased to have some good news. As a black man with a recent diagnosis of Prostate Cancer. I am super keen to read and learn as much about the disease. The two identified subtypes are so so interesting to me and I am sure many others. I wonder, how I can keep informed about the future of this research findings?

  • Carmel Micallef
    19 March 2024

    I have an aggressive prostate cancer and I found the information helpful.

  • Bob Selby
    13 March 2024

    This article is very interesting to me as a man and also an amateur medical student.
    Some years ago now there seemed to be great hope in using ensymes from red tomato skin to cure and possibly prevent prostrate cancer, with reports that tests had actually prove this theory, but there has since been no publicity about this.

  • Ronny Allan
    12 March 2024

    And there’s Neuroendocrine Neoplasm of the prostate. Is this a third type or does it fit the model here?

    Most are Neuroendocrine Carcinomas (I.e. poorly differentiated) but some are Neuroendocrine Tumours (I.e. well differentiated).

  • reply
    Amy Warnock
    12 March 2024

    Hi Ronny,
    Thank you for your comment.

    Neuroendocrine prostate cancer is a histological variant of prostate cancer, which is related to how the cancer cells look under a microscope.

    But in this paper, the researchers are classifying the two subtypes based on the evolution of the disease, which can help to give clues about how the disease might progress as well as have implications for treatment.

    It’s also worth noting that in this study they only examined samples from patients with intermediate or low risk prostate adenocarcinoma, which is the most common histological variant of prostate cancer. In their paper the authors do acknowledge that as this research is still in its early stages the findings may not be applicable to every prostate cancer case and there may be other evolutionary paths yet to be discovered.

    I hope that helps,
    Amy, Cancer Research UK

  • Martin Sullivan
    8 March 2024

    What exactly are the two subtypes of prostate cancer ? The article does not say

  • reply
    Jacob Smith
    11 March 2024

    Hi Martin,

    Thanks for your comment.

    The two evotypes identified in this research were named the ‘canonical’ and ‘alternative’ evotypes. These evotypes arise from what the researchers termed ‘divergent evolutionary trajectories’, meaning the tumours acquire different mutations to their DNA at different stages in their evolution.

    Specifically, the ‘alternative’ evotype diverges from the ‘canonical’ evotype by acquiring mutations in genes that affect a protein called an androgen receptor.

    I hope that helps,
    Jacob, Cancer Research UK

  • William Ferguson
    6 March 2024

    It’s really interesting from my perspective. Its good in the sense that my brother and I both have prostate cancer but different diagnosis. I’m 2 year older than him,he was diagnosed years before me,both have different life styles. Reading the articles are very informative.

  • Dionisio Cesar Mendiola Fernandez
    6 March 2024

    Very promising research for the management of prostate cancer patients.

    Comments

  • Tarhib IT Limited
    30 July 2024

    Fascinating discovery about prostate cancer! The use of artificial intelligence to uncover these insights is truly groundbreaking. Thanks for sharing this important advancement in cancer research!

  • ANDRES LOAIZA
    27 April 2024

    I believe that the most recent discrimination of Prostate Ca in 2 subgroups is very important at this time as Prostate Ca. presents in variable stages which allow the treatment to take place between patients and doctors but many times make the treatment and prognosis cumbersome in the precision and accuracy of treatment to medium and longterm. I had total prostatectomy by robotic surgery but significant secondary effects and its consequences

  • Paul Diggory
    24 March 2024

    This feels like hugely important research. After diagnosis with prostate cancer early last year I went through a radical prostatectomy in July. After three quarterly blood tests my second and third have shown increased PSA levels. Whilst still virtually undetectable my consultant feels it important to bring me back for radiotherapy. That’s OK, but what about hormone therapy? Some research points to it not being necessary, other work shows that it’s more likely to finish off the cancer if you have a course of both. But at what cost in terms of side effects that affect your quality of life. Clarity at an earlier stage on how best to treat your disease has to be a good thing for all future prostate cancer patients.

  • Michael Perris
    22 March 2024

    It is excellent news – quite ground breaking?
    I believe that GP’s need to be less doubting than some currently are. Due to these doubts action is often delayed to the detriment of the patient, which is very worrying indeed. I hope things progress in this area.
    Thank you all who are tirelessly working on a solution for this cancer.

  • Jennifer Hale
    22 March 2024

    Working as a research nurse with men who are diagnosed with prostate cancer, PSA readings and scans if PSA results start to climb are still the best indicators for progression. I would agree that many men live with the disease, and eventually die of something else. The exception being those who are diagnosed younger with metastatic spread at diagnosis. Family history can suggest a hereditary risk.

  • Jide Awe
    21 March 2024

    This statement in your write-up resonates: “While prostate cancer is responsible for a large proportion of all male cancer deaths, it is more commonly a disease men die with rather than from.”

  • Joseph Dublin
    19 March 2024

    Just great news and progress. So pleased to have some good news. As a black man with a recent diagnosis of Prostate Cancer. I am super keen to read and learn as much about the disease. The two identified subtypes are so so interesting to me and I am sure many others. I wonder, how I can keep informed about the future of this research findings?

  • Carmel Micallef
    19 March 2024

    I have an aggressive prostate cancer and I found the information helpful.

  • Bob Selby
    13 March 2024

    This article is very interesting to me as a man and also an amateur medical student.
    Some years ago now there seemed to be great hope in using ensymes from red tomato skin to cure and possibly prevent prostrate cancer, with reports that tests had actually prove this theory, but there has since been no publicity about this.

  • Ronny Allan
    12 March 2024

    And there’s Neuroendocrine Neoplasm of the prostate. Is this a third type or does it fit the model here?

    Most are Neuroendocrine Carcinomas (I.e. poorly differentiated) but some are Neuroendocrine Tumours (I.e. well differentiated).

  • reply
    Amy Warnock
    12 March 2024

    Hi Ronny,
    Thank you for your comment.

    Neuroendocrine prostate cancer is a histological variant of prostate cancer, which is related to how the cancer cells look under a microscope.

    But in this paper, the researchers are classifying the two subtypes based on the evolution of the disease, which can help to give clues about how the disease might progress as well as have implications for treatment.

    It’s also worth noting that in this study they only examined samples from patients with intermediate or low risk prostate adenocarcinoma, which is the most common histological variant of prostate cancer. In their paper the authors do acknowledge that as this research is still in its early stages the findings may not be applicable to every prostate cancer case and there may be other evolutionary paths yet to be discovered.

    I hope that helps,
    Amy, Cancer Research UK

  • Martin Sullivan
    8 March 2024

    What exactly are the two subtypes of prostate cancer ? The article does not say

  • reply
    Jacob Smith
    11 March 2024

    Hi Martin,

    Thanks for your comment.

    The two evotypes identified in this research were named the ‘canonical’ and ‘alternative’ evotypes. These evotypes arise from what the researchers termed ‘divergent evolutionary trajectories’, meaning the tumours acquire different mutations to their DNA at different stages in their evolution.

    Specifically, the ‘alternative’ evotype diverges from the ‘canonical’ evotype by acquiring mutations in genes that affect a protein called an androgen receptor.

    I hope that helps,
    Jacob, Cancer Research UK

  • William Ferguson
    6 March 2024

    It’s really interesting from my perspective. Its good in the sense that my brother and I both have prostate cancer but different diagnosis. I’m 2 year older than him,he was diagnosed years before me,both have different life styles. Reading the articles are very informative.

  • Dionisio Cesar Mendiola Fernandez
    6 March 2024

    Very promising research for the management of prostate cancer patients.