
A blood test that has the potential to detect over 50 kinds of cancer is now being trialled in the NHS in England.
The Galleri blood test, developed by the company GRAIL, aims to detect cancers earlier by looking for abnormal DNA shed from cancer cells into the blood.
So far, a lot of the research has been in people who have already been diagnosed with cancer. This study will assess if the test can spot cancer in people without symptoms.
There has been a lot of excitement about the Galleri test, and it’s obvious to see why, but that can sometimes make it difficult to understand the full picture.
Here’s what you need to know.
What’s the Galleri blood test and how does it work?
The Galleri test is a blood test that has the potential of detecting multiple types of cancer. It does this by looking for DNA found in the blood, called cell-free DNA (cfDNA), that’s shed by both tumour cells and healthy cells into the bloodstream.
In order to only pick up on cfDNA that indicates the presence of cancer, Galleri uses modern genetic sequencing technology and artificial intelligence to scan for patterns of chemical changes in the cfDNA that come from cancer cells but aren’t found in healthy cells.
Galleri is only available in the UK in research settings at the moment, because there are important questions that need answering before it’s known if it should be used more widely.
What do we know so far?
Results from studies into Galleri have so far been promising.
GRAIL reports that the test can detect 50 different types of cancer with a false positive rate of 0.5%. This means that in approximately 200 people tested, 1 person would be expected to receive a positive result when they do not have cancer.
In a study involving people who had already been diagnosed with cancer, the test accurately detected cancer in 51.5% of people. This gives an indication of the test’s sensitivity. The Galleri test was able to correctly predict the location of the tumour 89% of the time, which is important for knowing which follow-up diagnostic tests the patient needs to confirm their diagnosis.
A key challenge that this type of test faces is the difficulty in detecting very small quantities of abnormal DNA circulating in the blood.
Because the amount of tumour-derived cfDNA tends to increase as a cancer becomes more advanced, these types of blood tests tend to be better at picking up later stage disease. Based on the results reported so far, the test is not currently that good at picking up stage 1 cancer, where the cancer is small and hasn’t spread to other parts of the body.
What’s more, the number of cancers that have been analysed, particularly for some rarer cancer types, has been very small.
The NHS trial is an opportunity to trial the test in a much larger sample, with longer follow up of patients not testing positive and a chance to answer some of the big questions and iron out some of these limitations.
What’s the NHS study looking at?
The NHS trial will focus on whether the Galleri test can accurately and reliably detect cancer in people who aren’t suspected as having cancer and if it can find cancer at earlier stages than would otherwise have been the case.
It’s being organised by GRAIL in partnership with NHS England and will be run by The Cancer Research UK and King’s College London Cancer Prevention Trials Unit, led by director Professor Peter Sasieni.
Initially, the trial will recruit 140,000 people aged 50 to 77 who will be identified through NHS records and invited to take part.
A crucial consideration is that the research gives information about how acceptable and effective the test is across our diverse population and the team are keen to ensure they recruit participants from different background and ethnicities.
Everyone who takes part in the trial will have annual blood tests for 2 years. Half will have their samples tested using Galleri, and half will have theirs stored for future analysis. Those in the intervention group who receive a positive Galleri blood test result will be referred for further investigations in the NHS.
The trial will see if the test can significantly reduce the number of cancer cases diagnosed late at stages 3 or 4, compared to those whose samples aren’t tested. It will also help identify the negative impacts of the test. This includes monitoring the number of people who test positive but don’t go on to be diagnosed with cancer and if any cancers are missed by false negatives.
Initial results from this study are expected to be released by 2023. If positive, the study will be expanded to involve around 1 million participants in 2024 and 2025. There will also be longer term follow up of the participants, to see if there were any differences in the number of people dying of cancer in the different groups.
Thinking of joining the trial?
Research is vital to making progress. But there’s a lot to consider when taking part in research, so we’d encourage anyone who receives an invitation to the GRAIL Galleri trial to read the information and decide what’s right for them.
If you do decide to take part, it’s really important that you still report any unusual changes in your health to a GP and consider invitations to NHS cancer screening as you would do normally.
This is because not everyone in the trial will have their blood samples analysed, and the test won’t identify everyone who has cancer.
You can find out more on the NHS Digital website
In a different study, 25,000 people with possible cancer symptoms will also be offered the test once they have been referred to hospital. People taking part in the study (SYMPLIFY) will have their diagnostic test(s) in the normal way, but will also give a blood sample and permission for the study team to check their health records later to see if they were diagnosed with cancer and what appointments and other tests they had.
At the end of the study, having tested the blood with the Galleri test, the team will understand more about how well it works in this group of people.
This will help them to design a trial where they can further explore if the test can be used to decide who needs rapid referral to look for a possible cancer and what diagnostic tests might be appropriate to use.
This might be particularly helpful when patients experience symptoms that could be linked to several different types of cancer.
One to watch
The Galleri blood test has encouraging initial data, and it’s great to see NHS England supporting research on this scale because there are many questions that need to be answered before it could be made available in the NHS, including how useful and effective it is and who it might be best to use it with and when.
It will take time to know if Galleri can make a difference and how it should best be used. And regardless of the results, one test alone is unlikely to get us to the point where all cancers are detected at an early stage. Galleri isn’t the only test of its kind in development – research into different ways of detecting cancer early range from blood tests to urine and even poo tests.
In the past year alone we have seen news of blood and urine tests to detect brain, bladder, ovarian and lung cancers, all at varying stages of development.
And tests like these are just one part of a wider picture of investment and action needed to increase the number of cancers detected earlier.
Other recent innovative approaches, such as Cytosponge, the ‘sponge-on-a-string’ to detect a condition that could lead to oesophageal cancer, and Colon Capsule Endoscopy, a disposable camera that’s small enough to swallow and powerful enough to help rule out bowel cancer, exemplify the huge potential of this research field.
These innovations must be supported by having enough NHS staff, infrastructure and kit to ensure that innovative tests can be made available to everyone who could benefit.
It’s early days for the GRAIL blood test. But it’s so exciting to see this research happening and we look forward to seeing more tests of promise being taken through to trials, pilots and implementation, to drive much-needed benefit for patients.
Harry
This article was amended on 12/10/2021 to reflect that most of the trials so far have involved people who have already been diagnosed with cancer, but other studies are also ongoing.
Comments
Sophia February 25, 2022
I have send an comments
Sylvia Costa-Fox February 25, 2022
I will be 50 year old soon, I am a single mum as I Lost my husband few years ago with prostate cancer after a long battle against it. My daughter was only 6 years old.
I always was so scared about cancer and after my
Husband passed away I
Just would do everything I can to help increase research in the area and also if possible discover if I have any kind of cancer and treat it in the early stages as my daughter can’t loose her mother as well.
I really would like to be part of this trial.
Thank you.
Jean jones February 25, 2022
Several members of my family died from cancer. My mum in 1959 breast cancer my dad 1969 lung cancer. I would love to participate in trials I am 72. My daughter is 47 and her dad has been treated for stomach cancelled. She has 4 children and I would like to protect her
Natalie Fowler February 25, 2022
I would happily take part in the research but I am 42 years old. It is so important to continue with research to improve the outcomes of detecting and treating cancers. Thank you.
Janet Houselander February 25, 2022
The blood test is particularly exciting as it is possibly so early in detection
Christine Graham February 25, 2022
This is an amazing development in the research you are doing. I consider it a major breakthrough for early detection as the rate of people with cancer is frighteningly high with no signs of slowing down. I would like to see more younger people included in the trial they are the ones with their lives ahead of them have young families and all to frequent their cancers are far more aggressive
Anne February 24, 2022
I have just given my first blood sample as a participant in the Galleri research – very happy and excited to be part of this project.
Alison February 24, 2022
Very interesting to read that this trial is to take place. I have no history of cancer in my immediate family but have lost many friends over the years. Would welcome the opportunity to take part.
Margaret February 24, 2022
I was recently asked if I would take part in the trial and had my appointment yesterday. I was more than happy to participate as I had kidney cancer six years ago and feel so lucky that it was found in time.
P Hughes February 24, 2022
Would be verywilling to take part –
On basis of blood test in autumn 2010 GP said I had cancer but hospital did not discover
it until 2014, always wondered why.
Sarah Garland February 24, 2022
I would like to take part, having pancreatic cancer in 2 close family members and ovarian cancer, bladder and breast cancer
Always supporting cancer research our family are huge supporters x
This article is brilliant going forward, much needed for these cancers xx
Victoria Bullen February 24, 2022
Excellent news and exciting!
Christina February 8, 2022
I was interested in the article and hope that modifications will continue to be made which will increase the positivity of the test. Having lost numerous family members to cancer, I would happily be involved in future testing.
Susan February 7, 2022
Would be more than willing to take part. I lost my husband 16 months ago to cancer of the bladder,which went completely undetected until a week before he died. Trials like this are so necessary.
Rene February 7, 2022
Good to new developments… So I realize that research is important for further progress in all you do
Janet January 30, 2022
I took part in this blood test trial in November last year and I am so pleased I did. I was unfortunately diagnosed with possible lung cancer and referred for further investigations which proved positive and at an early stage and now receiving treatment. I had no symptoms at the time of the test and must admit the outcome was initially a bit of a shock, but grateful that this trial has enabled treatment to be given at the early stages and hopefully will increase my chance of survival
Bill Randall November 5, 2021
I was interested in participation until I read the following in your article: “In a study involving people who had already been diagnosed with cancer, the test accurately detected cancer in 51.5% of people.”
This is almost the same as chance, isn’t it? So tossing a coin and saying, “heads you’ve got cancer, tails you haven’t.” would give fairly similar results.
Given that the subjects were already diagnosed with cancer, presumably one would expect fairly high concentrations of the relevant DNA fragments in their blood. So surely a far better detection rate than 1.5% above chance would be expected if the test really is sensitive and discriminates well.
Or am I missing something?
Freya Luling Feilding November 10, 2021
Hi Bill,
Thanks for your question. This figure is from this published study in the US. The 51.5% figure reported is the overall sensitivity of the test – the proportion of people who had a positive test result among all cancer participants tested (across all cancer types and clinical stages). The sensitivity of cfDNA analysis is limited by the amount of tumour DNA in the blood. Different cancers shed DNA into the bloodstream at different rates and the proportion of tumour-derived cfDNA in the blood tends to increase as cancer progresses. This means that the ability of this test to detect cancer varies by both cancer type and clinical stage, so it is better at picking up some cancers than others. Your comment highlights why further research is so important, and we eagerly await the findings of the NHS-Galleri screening trial, and the study exploring the use of the Galleri test in symptomatic populations.
Best wishes,
Freya, Cancer Research UK
Harpal Kumar October 8, 2021
Please can you correct an error in this blog. Galleri HAS been tested on people who have not yet been diagnosed with cancer, contrary to your third and a subsequent paragraph. For example, the Pathfinder study of 6600 people in the US was entirely asymptomatic people; data was recently presented at ASCO on the interim results from this study.
Katie Roberts October 12, 2021
Dear Harpal,
Thanks for your comment, we’ve amended the article.
Best wishes,
Katie, Cancer Research UK
Barbara Pearson September 18, 2021
If not to old at 75 I would love to take part. Lost my father to stomach cancer and mother to bowel cancer ( metastatic)
Karen Maxwell-pinder September 17, 2021
Brilliant more than happy to volunteer fit healthy aged 58 mother of five grandmother of 10 work for nhs full recovery from covid ready when you are if neeeded
Tracy Saxelby September 17, 2021
Would be interested in taking part in this trial
Jeanette Revel September 17, 2021
Great news all the research that is being done. I was love to help but just had breast cancer. But good luck
Jennifer millman September 17, 2021
I have had breast cancer,and would love to do a trail
Jennifer millman September 17, 2021
I would like to take part have had cancer
ian wallbridge February 25, 2022
I have suffered Prostate cancer in the past and am aware of a recurrence in the same or possibly another cancer type. Any research is vital in helping to diagnose and help eliminate the disease. Successful blood tests are a positive way forward as they are non invasive. I would be interested in taking part in any future trials.