Scientists are working to develop a blood test that picks up microbial signatures indicative of cancer.
This entry is part 4 of 4 in the series Detecting cancer early
The idea of taking a small vial of blood and being able to detect cancer at its earliest and most treatable stages is an attractive one. And it’s something that cancer researchers are actively exploring.
But, despite their efforts, a reliable and accurate blood test to help detect cancer early has proved elusive. It turns out that hunting for cancer clues in the blood is no mean feat.
For one thing, cancer is extremely complex. There are over 200 types of cancers, and each cancer will release hundreds of different markers into the blood. But they’re not alone, the blood is also packed full of healthy cells and other molecules too. In just 1 ml of blood there are around 5 billion red blood cells.
“Researchers have been looking for a blood test for the early detection of cancer for many, many years,” says Professor Tim Aitman, a Cancer Research UK-funded genetic expert at the University of Edinburgh. “But the problem is, that these tests currently lack sensitivity and specificity. Either the test might not pick up a person’s cancer when they do have it, or it indicates someone has cancer when they don’t.”
Finding cancer in the blood, particularly early cancer, has been compared to finding a needle in a haystack. Which means scientists must be smart about what they look for.
What can be detected in the blood?
Scientists are exploring multiple ways to detect cancer in the blood. And, so far, most of the progress has been made in developing blood tests that help to monitor whether someone’s cancer has returned or to inform treatment options.
“The hope is that similar tests could be used for both early detection and monitoring,” says Aitman.
Cancer Research UK funded researchers in Manchester are looking to develop a blood test to track cancer cells that have broken free and begun to circulate in the bloodstream. When studied in the lab, these circulating tumour cells could give useful information about a person’s cancer and help scientists monitor their response to treatment.
But looking for entire, intact cancer cells isn’t the only way to hunt for cancer in the blood. Scientists are looking for even smaller clues.
Aitman describes how in the last 10 years or so scientists have found that when cancer cells die, which happens constantly as a tumour develops and grows, they release tiny bits of DNA into the blood. This free-floating DNA (known as cell-free DNA) carries a footprint of the cancer itself, which can be analysed to detect cancer.
“Once the blood sample has been collected, the cell-free DNA found can be sequenced and we can look for changes in the genome that might indicate cancers,” says Aitman.
And it’s not just the DNA code that scientists can use to help diagnose cancer. They’re also looking for markers on the DNA that affect how and when it’s read. An example of this type of change is DNA methylation, which can be found on free-floating DNA from cancer cells.
Blood tests that pick up these clues are being developed for a variety of different cancers, each relying on different markers.
But there’s also work ongoing to develop a test that can detect multiple types of cancer. Aitman explains that scientists have uncovered DNA changes that can be found in multiple cancers, which means in theory a test could be developed to detect several different cancers at once. But in order for a test like this to be useful, it would also need to signal where the cancer is growing.
The next small thing
Professor Tony Ng at King’s College London is interested in a different marker released by cancer cells – microscopic, liquid-filled bubbles called exosomes. These bubbles can sprout off cells and travel into the bloodstream, taking within them some of the cancer cell’s contents.
But while these microscope bubbles might be floating in the blood, the big question for Ng’s team is how to distinguish cancer cell exosomes from those budding off healthy cells. For now, they’re focusing on the differences in the amounts of particular proteins, which are found to be elevated in patients known to have certain types of cancers, to see if higher levels of these proteins indicate cancer. But there are other clues that could be hiding within or on these bubbles.
Work on exosomes is currently at a very early stage, with scientists still identifying the best molecules to monitor. But one day, Ng’s team hope to develop a test that could analyse the contents of exosomes, using them as an early indicator of cancer.
The challenges of detecting cancer early
Whatever marker a test is aiming to pick up, the common challenge for scientists is being able to detect cancer clues in small volumes of blood.
Take free floating DNA – these fragments are present at incredibly low concentrations, making up less than 1% of the total cell free DNA found in the blood. This makes it very difficult for scientists to find cancer cells’ DNA floating in the 10-20 ml of blood taken during a routine blood test.
And it becomes even more tricky if the aim is to detect the very early stages of cancer development where the amount of DNA shed from the tumour is even smaller.
Find out more: what makes a cancer test
It’s not just low concentrations of the tell-tale signs scientists have to contend with, they also need to make sure that a test won’t pick up signs of cancers that would never go on to cause harm and wouldn’t necessarily need to be treated.
Aitman’s view is that liquid biopsies may never replace traditional technologies such as tissue biopsy or imaging, but it will provide a lot of useful information that will complement existing approaches. And Ng agrees.
“Seeing is believing”
“You can’t definitively tell a patient they have cancer unless you have an image. Seeing is believing,” says Ng.
But blood tests may provide a cheap and easy way to identify people who may need more detailed (and more expensive) tests. Ng says that some people with breast cancer that’s come back may have markers that can be picked up by a blood test, even when their cancer is too small to be detected by a mammogram or CT scan. Doctors could use this information to send people for more sensitive tests.
“If someone has high levels of a marker that suggests cancer in their blood, they could then be sent for a CT scan, which could be supplemented by PET-CT should there be ambiguity regarding the nature of the lesion detected on the CT scan.”
And the same is true when it comes to detecting cancer early. Ng believes combining tests that looks for cell-free DNA and exosomes in the blood with scans could help give a more complete picture of the cancer and strengthen the accuracy of the diagnosis.
The potential of detecting cancer early
“The idea behind early detection is that the earlier you treat cancer, the more successfully you will be able to treat it,” says Ng. “We’ve never been so close to the possibility of treating cancer that people didn’t know they have. That’s a new paradigm.”
But while the promise of a ‘simple’ blood test to detect cancer is huge, Aitman thinks there’s a lot more to do.
“I’m very optimistic about the use of liquid biopsies, particularly in tumour monitoring and guiding therapy. It will change the way cancer is treated,” says Aitman. “But when it comes to the early detection of new cancers in the healthy population, we’ve still got a long way to go.”
Angharad Kolator Baldwin is a science media officer at Cancer Research UK
- What makes a cancer test?
- Urine tests: detecting cancer in pee
- Poo tests: looking for cancer clues in poo
- Blood tests: using blood to detect cancer early
I A Mokashi December 17, 2019
Thanks for this article!. Cancer is a very dangerous and tough disease that will collapse not only the patient but also his family. it damages will damage physically and economically. But luckily we are in a generation we have some Doctors, Hospitals which gives the best treatment at low cost. With the best treatment and Strong Inner Strenght, we will definitely win against Cancer.
Steve December 15, 2019
I think you should STOP feeding people this sort of thing, about what you’re trying to do, so that people keep sending in money, because at this moment in time it is just false hope, like it has been for decades and decades, and nothing more. How many decades do you need? God only knows how many researchers and scientists worldwide, go to work 365 days a year, year in year out and still no cure! Cancer Research will be saying the same thing for the next 100 years, unless of course there is another money spinning disease that develops to take it’s place. The only thing Cancer Research ever does is tell you, we’re trying to do this and we’re trying to do that and there are promising results with our latest trials, but we need your help to fund further research. You will NEVER find a CURE sadly for Cancer in our lifetime, that we the public will be aware of anyway. I personally think there has been a cure for years, but that’s just my belief! You are always so close to discovering this or that, but you never ever quite get there? So people keep donating, that’s why, and then we hear nothing more about it. Try putting up something where you have found a cure for some cancers and let’s see the proof, instead of another drug that doesn’t cure only treats the disease with worse side effects than the disease itself! Do that, show us the proof of total success at curing at least ONE cancer, and then ask for donations to help fund more research, but stop drip feeding supposedly encouraging moves forward and start posting RESULTS!
Tony Mc Grory December 6, 2019
Circulating t-cell technology is very promising but specificity still remains elusive. Full marks for highlighting this important subject.